Ken Levine is the man at the helm of the good ship Bioshock, but he sees himself as more the “editor of a magazine … but I’m also a writer for the magazine.” Not because of any particular beef with the auteur approach to game making, it’s more of a semantic disagreement. “I believe more in editorship. Auteur sounds like you do everything,” he went on. We completely agree, Ken Levine, everything sounds more arrogant in French. But what of the movie based on the game he auteured?
The Role of Editorship in Game Development
Ken Levine’s perspective on game development is quite intriguing. He emphasizes the importance of editorship over the auteur approach. In his view, editorship involves collaboration and refinement, ensuring that the final product is a polished and cohesive piece of work. This approach allows for multiple voices and ideas to contribute to the game’s development, creating a richer and more diverse experience for players.
Levine’s role as an editor means he oversees the creative process, guiding the team while also contributing his own ideas. This collaborative effort is essential in creating a game as complex and immersive as Bioshock. The game’s intricate storyline, detailed environments, and compelling characters are a testament to the effectiveness of this approach. By fostering a collaborative environment, Levine ensures that the game remains true to its vision while also benefiting from the diverse talents of his team.
Challenges of Adapting Bioshock to Film
The transition from video game to film is fraught with challenges, and Levine’s involvement in the Bioshock movie adaptation highlights the importance of staying true to the source material. “If I were to make a game that was based on somebody else’s franchise, you need somebody there who’s going to say, ‘This is true to the franchise, this isn’t true to the franchise.’ So that was more my role in the film,” Levine explained. This role is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the original game while adapting it to a different medium.
Adapting a game like Bioshock, with its rich narrative and complex themes, requires a delicate balance. The film must capture the essence of the game while also appealing to a broader audience. This is no small feat, as Hollywood has a history of struggling with video game adaptations. Fans of the game are often wary of how their beloved franchise will be portrayed on the big screen, and rightfully so. The fear of seeing iconic characters and storylines reduced to clichés or misrepresented is a valid concern.
Levine’s involvement in the film adaptation provides a sense of reassurance to fans. His deep understanding of the game’s universe and his commitment to preserving its core elements are vital in ensuring that the film remains faithful to the original. However, the process is not without its pitfalls. Hollywood’s tendency to prioritize commercial success over artistic integrity can lead to significant deviations from the source material. The hypothetical scenario of Fontaine and Ryan having a dance-off to decide who gets to take Tenenbaum to prom, while humorous, underscores the potential for missteps in the adaptation process.
In conclusion, Ken Levine’s approach to game development and his role in the Bioshock film adaptation highlight the importance of editorship and fidelity to the source material. By fostering a collaborative environment and staying true to the game’s vision, Levine ensures that Bioshock remains a beloved and respected franchise. As fans eagerly await the film adaptation, they can take comfort in knowing that Levine’s guiding hand will help navigate the challenges of bringing Rapture to the big screen.
Source Joystiq
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
