The High Court in the UK has ordered British Internet Service Providers to block access to 32 more piracy websites in the UK. What makes this ruling particularly significant is that some of the newly blocked sites are actually members-only sites that have no pirated files listed in public. This move marks a notable shift in the approach to combating online piracy, targeting not just public torrent and streaming sites but also private communities that operate under a veil of exclusivity.
ISPs Ordered to Block Access
The court has mandated that major ISPs including BT, TalkTalk, Virgin, Telefonica, and EE block access to these 32 websites. BT has already begun implementing the blocks on some of the sites. This action is part of a broader strategy to curb illegal file sharing and protect intellectual property rights. The list of new sites that have been blocked in the UK includes IPTorrents.com, BitSoup.me, and TorrentDay.com, among others. The block follows a complaint filed by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) with the UK High Court.
The inclusion of members-only sites in the block list is a noteworthy development. These sites often require an invitation to join and are perceived as more secure by their users. By targeting these private communities, the court is sending a clear message that no site is beyond the reach of legal action if it facilitates piracy.
Implications and Future Actions
Despite these efforts, there are still many other streaming and torrent sites available in the UK. The MPAA and other rights holders are likely to continue their legal battles to have more sites blocked in the future. This ongoing cat-and-mouse game between content creators and pirates shows no signs of slowing down. Each new blocklist expansion is a step towards reducing the availability of pirated content, but it also prompts pirates to find new ways to circumvent these measures.
For instance, many users turn to Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to bypass ISP blocks and access restricted sites. VPNs can mask a user’s IP address, making it appear as though they are accessing the internet from a different location where the site is not blocked. This presents a significant challenge for authorities trying to enforce these blocks.
Moreover, the effectiveness of these blocks is often debated. While they can reduce casual piracy by making it more difficult for the average user to access pirated content, determined pirates often find alternative methods. This includes using mirror sites, which are copies of the original sites hosted on different domains, or switching to other platforms that have not yet been targeted by legal actions.
The legal landscape is also evolving, with courts and lawmakers continually adapting to new technologies and methods used by pirates. For example, there has been an increasing focus on targeting the financial infrastructure that supports piracy sites, such as payment processors and advertising networks. By cutting off revenue streams, authorities hope to make it less profitable to operate these sites.
The UK High Court’s decision to block access to 32 more piracy websites, including members-only sites, represents a significant step in the ongoing battle against online piracy. While this move may disrupt the activities of some pirates, it is unlikely to be a definitive solution. The fight against piracy is a complex and evolving challenge that requires a multifaceted approach, including legal action, technological measures, and public awareness campaigns. As the digital landscape continues to change, so too will the strategies employed by both pirates and those seeking to protect intellectual property rights.
Source TorrentFreak, Techmeme
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
