Okay, getting something for free which allows you to do something you already could have done for free may not seem like a huge deal, but look at it this way: you’re getting new gaming hardware. That’s something, right? Also, we’re guessing all those people who were posting pictures of their thirteen-year-old pre-order slips back when news of Duke’s resurrection broke don’t qualify.
As an alternative, you can also apparently get a free Full Pass to any other game instead of the OnLive Game System. What we’d rather get is a breakdown of how many people take the Full Pass over the MicroConsole. Or better yet just bypass OnLive altogether and get it on a platform where it’s actually playable. It’s not entirely PSN’s fault, but let’s just say we’ve learned to appreciate the value of good solid local hard drive space under our game’s feet. We were joking, it was totally PSN’s fault.
The Appeal of Free Gaming Hardware
The allure of free gaming hardware cannot be understated. For many gamers, the opportunity to get their hands on new technology without spending a dime is incredibly enticing. The OnLive Game System, for instance, offers a unique way to experience games through cloud streaming. This means that even if your current hardware is outdated, you can still enjoy the latest titles with decent performance. The concept of cloud gaming has been gaining traction, and services like OnLive were pioneers in this space, paving the way for modern equivalents like Google Stadia and NVIDIA GeForce Now.
However, the choice between a Full Pass and the MicroConsole is intriguing. A Full Pass allows gamers to access a wide range of titles without the need for additional hardware. This can be particularly appealing for those who already have a capable gaming setup and don’t want to clutter their space with more devices. On the other hand, the MicroConsole offers a dedicated piece of hardware specifically designed for gaming, which can provide a more streamlined and optimized experience.
Cloud Gaming vs. Local Storage
The debate between cloud gaming and local storage is ongoing. Cloud gaming offers the convenience of accessing games from anywhere with a stable internet connection. It eliminates the need for high-end hardware, as the heavy lifting is done on remote servers. This can be a game-changer for those who travel frequently or have limited space for gaming equipment. However, it also comes with its own set of challenges, such as latency issues and the need for a reliable internet connection.
Local storage, on the other hand, provides a more traditional gaming experience. Games are installed directly on your device, ensuring that you have full control over your gaming environment. This can lead to better performance and reduced latency, as there is no need to stream data over the internet. Additionally, local storage allows for modding and customization, which can enhance the gaming experience.
While cloud gaming services like OnLive have their merits, they also highlight the importance of having a robust local storage solution. The PlayStation Network (PSN) outage mentioned earlier serves as a reminder of the potential pitfalls of relying solely on online services. When PSN went down, gamers were left without access to their digital libraries, underscoring the value of having games stored locally.
The choice between cloud gaming and local storage ultimately comes down to personal preference and individual circumstances. Both options have their advantages and drawbacks, and the best choice will vary depending on your specific needs and gaming habits. Whether you opt for the convenience of cloud gaming or the reliability of local storage, the most important thing is to enjoy the gaming experience to the fullest.
Source OnLive
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
