Samsung and Apple are engaged in a number of different lawsuits with each company accusing the other of infringing on their patents, and now Samsung has asserted eight additional patents against Apple.
Two of the patents are part of FRAND, and five of the patents were originally granted to Samsung whilst three of them were purchased from their previous owners.
The Nature of FRAND Patents
FRAND stands for “Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory” terms. These are standards that ensure essential patents are licensed out in a manner that is fair and reasonable to all parties. The inclusion of FRAND patents in the lawsuit indicates that Samsung believes Apple is using technology that is essential to industry standards without proper licensing. This can often lead to complex legal battles, as the definition of what constitutes “fair and reasonable” can be highly subjective and open to interpretation. For instance, FRAND patents often cover technologies that are crucial for the interoperability of devices, such as wireless communication standards. This makes them a hotbed for litigation, as companies strive to protect their intellectual property while also adhering to industry standards.
Details of the Additional Patents
The five patents originally granted to Samsung cover a range of technologies, from user interface innovations to hardware design. These patents are crucial for Samsung as they represent the company’s own research and development efforts. For example, one of these patents might cover a specific method for touch screen interaction, which is a fundamental aspect of modern smartphones. The three patents that were purchased from previous owners add another layer of complexity to the case. These patents could cover older technologies that have been integrated into newer devices, making it difficult to determine the extent of infringement.
A trial relating to these eight new patents has been scheduled for July in the US, although there are reports that the two companies have scheduled talks to discuss their various patent differences. This trial is expected to be a significant event, as it will not only address the specific patents in question but also set precedents for future technology-related lawsuits. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for both companies, affecting their market strategies and product designs.
The scheduled talks between the two companies indicate a willingness to negotiate and possibly reach a settlement. Such discussions are often a pragmatic approach to avoid the high costs and uncertainties associated with prolonged litigation. In previous cases, companies have reached cross-licensing agreements, where each party grants the other rights to use certain patents. This can be a win-win situation, allowing both companies to continue their operations without the looming threat of legal action.
Source Foss Patents, BGR
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
