I’m pretty sure that’s one sentence you weren’t expecting to read today. Bits of it, sure, but that as a whole, probably not. Yes, turns out Gearbox is either one of the most progressive purveyors of sexist filth or scary good at reverse psychology. Because as far as I can tell, the number of feminists bringing the pain to the King is about the same as that of feminists campaigning for higher heels on pumps.
“I’ll tell you what, if some feminist organisation that is doing a great job advocating women’s rights worldwide, which I think is really important, can get some advantage by using Duke… go for it,” Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford says. “How is there a downside for humanity? Go for it. Take it. Use Duke. That would be awesome.” There’s something about this story that I just like. There’s freedom of speech, freedom of dissent and a sort of cheery underhandedness to it all. Faux feminist baiting has never been so lighthearted.
The Controversial Legacy of Duke Nukem
Duke Nukem Forever, a game that took over a decade to develop, has always been a lightning rod for controversy. The character of Duke Nukem himself is a hyper-masculine, wise-cracking action hero who embodies many of the stereotypes that modern society is increasingly critical of. His antics, which include objectifying women and using crude humor, have often been cited as examples of the problematic elements in video games. Yet, despite—or perhaps because of—these controversies, the game has maintained a cult following.
The debate around Duke Nukem Forever isn’t just about the character or the content of the game; it’s also about what it represents. For some, Duke Nukem is a relic of a bygone era, a symbol of the kind of unrestrained, politically incorrect humor that was more acceptable in the 1990s. For others, it’s a problematic figure that perpetuates harmful stereotypes and should be left in the past. This dichotomy makes the game a fascinating case study in how cultural norms evolve and how media can both reflect and shape those norms.
Gearbox’s Unique Stance
Gearbox Software, the company that eventually brought Duke Nukem Forever to market, has taken a rather unique stance on the controversy. Instead of shying away from the criticism, Gearbox has embraced it in a way that is both surprising and refreshing. Randy Pitchford’s comments about feminists using Duke Nukem as a tool for advocacy are a prime example of this. By inviting critics to co-opt the character for their own purposes, Gearbox is effectively turning the tables on the controversy.
This approach is not without its risks. By encouraging feminists to use Duke Nukem as a symbol, Gearbox is walking a fine line between genuine support for women’s rights and what could be seen as a cynical marketing ploy. However, the very fact that Pitchford is willing to make such a statement suggests a level of openness and flexibility that is rare in the gaming industry.
Moreover, this strategy could have broader implications for how controversial media is handled in the future. If other companies follow Gearbox’s lead, we might see a shift towards more open, dialog-driven approaches to criticism. This could lead to a more nuanced understanding of the issues at hand and, ultimately, to more inclusive and thoughtful media.
The story of Duke Nukem Forever and Gearbox’s response to its critics is a fascinating example of how controversy can be navigated in the modern age. By embracing criticism and inviting dialogue, Gearbox has turned a potential PR nightmare into an opportunity for meaningful discussion. Whether or not you agree with their approach, it’s hard to deny that it’s an interesting and innovative way to handle controversy.
Via Eurogamer
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
