According to Cnet, the Silicon Valley police are looking into the lost iPhone prototype, which appeared in Gizmodo last week. The iPhone prototype, also known as the iPhone 4G, was lost by Apple Software Engineer Gary Powell. While he was at a bar one evening, someone picked it up, and it eventually ended up in the hands of Gizmodo.
According to Gizmodo, the unnamed person who found the iPhone prototype attempted to return the phone to Apple via their support line but didn’t get any response. They then contacted Gizmodo, and the tech blog purchased it for $5,000.
Later that week, Gizmodo was contacted by Apple, and they subsequently returned the iPhone to Apple. Now it looks like the computer crime task force led by Santa Clara County is investigating the lost iPhone.
The Investigation and Potential Legal Implications
The investigation is being conducted to see if there is sufficient evidence to file criminal charges, although who these charges will be brought against is not clear. The legal implications of this case are complex. On one hand, the person who found the phone and sold it to Gizmodo could potentially face charges for theft or misappropriation of lost property. On the other hand, Gizmodo could face legal scrutiny for purchasing what was clearly a prototype device, which might be considered stolen property.
The case raises important questions about journalistic ethics and the responsibilities of tech companies in safeguarding their intellectual property. If Apple really didn’t want details of their new iPhone 4G to be leaked, they would have kept it under lock and key and not let a junior employee leave their offices with one. This incident highlights the challenges tech companies face in maintaining secrecy around their upcoming products, especially in an age where information can be disseminated rapidly online.
Broader Implications for Tech Journalism
This incident also has broader implications for tech journalism. Gizmodo’s decision to purchase the prototype for $5,000 is a testament to the high stakes involved in breaking exclusive stories in the tech world. Such scoops can drive significant traffic and attention to a publication, but they also come with ethical and legal risks.
For example, in 2007, a similar incident occurred when an Apple employee left an iPhone prototype in a bar. The device was returned without any legal consequences, but the situation was handled more discreetly. The Gizmodo case, however, became a public spectacle, drawing attention to the lengths to which tech blogs might go to secure exclusive content.
Moreover, this case could set a precedent for how similar situations are handled in the future. If charges are brought against Gizmodo or the person who found the phone, it could deter others from engaging in similar activities. Conversely, if no charges are filed, it might embolden others to take similar risks for the sake of a scoop.
Lets hope no charges are brought against Gizmodo. The tech community often relies on leaks and insider information to stay ahead of the curve, and penalizing such actions could stifle the flow of information. However, it also underscores the need for responsible journalism and ethical considerations in reporting.
Have a look at our Apple iPhone 4 Review.
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
